Max Verstappen Takes Legal Action: Files $50 Million Lawsuit Against The View’ Over Defamation Claims

In a shocking move, Max Verstappen, the two-time Formula 1 World Champion, has filed a massive $50 million lawsuit against the popular talk show The View and its outspoken co-host Joy Behar. The lawsuit, which was filed in New York federal court, alleges that Behar and the show intentionally tarnished Verstappen’s reputation during a live broadcast in what he describes as a calculated attempt at a “public execution” of his character.

The legal filing has already sent ripples through both the sports world and the entertainment industry. Verstappen, widely considered one of the best drivers in the history of Formula 1, claims that Behar’s comments during an April 2025 broadcast were not only defamatory but also made with malicious intent. He alleges that the remarks, which were made in jest, misrepresented his character and painted him as a “villain” within the international sports community.

A Dispute Erupts Live on TV

The controversial remarks occurred during a segment of The View in which the hosts discussed the latest Formula 1 season. Verstappen had just won a major race, further solidifying his dominance in the sport. Behar, who has made no secret of her disdain for motorsport, reportedly made several comments that many viewers perceived as dismissive and derogatory toward Verstappen.

Behar, known for her provocative style, suggested that Verstappen’s recent victories were the result of “shady tactics” and insinuated that his success was not purely due to s𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁. The comments took a particularly personal turn when Behar said that Verstappen’s “arrogance” and “lack of sportsmanship” were turning fans away from the sport. She also made several allusions to Verstappen’s competitive nature, which many fans and experts saw as a jab at his character.

“I don’t know why people think this guy is such a hero. He’s winning, sure, but at what cost? He’s a bully on the track,” Behar remarked during the segment.

The comments sparked an immediate backlash from Verstappen’s fans, many of whom took to social media to defend the driver. Verstappen, who had not publicly responded at the time, later admitted in a private interview that he was “deeply hurt” by the remarks, which he viewed as a personal attack.

The Lawsuit: A Game-Changer for Live TV

In his lawsuit, Verstappen is seeking $50 million in damages, accusing Behar and The View of defamation, emotional distress, and “calculated maliciousness.” The filing alleges that the comments not only misrepresented Verstappen’s character but also caused tangible harm to his reputation, both in the world of motorsport and beyond.

“Joy Behar and The View attempted to assassinate my reputation in front of millions of viewers. They tried to turn me into a villain without basis or evidence, and I cannot allow that to stand,” Verstappen said in a statement following the lawsuit’s announcement. “This lawsuit is about holding people accountable for their words and ensuring that the truth comes to light.”

The lawsuit includes evidence of social media posts, viewer reactions, and comments from various motorsport insiders who have stated that Behar’s statements were not only inaccurate but also harmful to the sport’s global image. Verstappen’s legal team has also compiled statements from several current and former F1 drivers, who have expressed concerns over how media figures like Behar contribute to the growing negative perception of the sport.

Verstappen’s lawyer, Michael Anderson, emphasized that this case could set a major precedent for how public figures are allowed to comment on athletes and sports figures without facing legal consequences. “This is not just about Max Verstappen. This is about all athletes, who deserve to be treated with respect and fairness in the media,” Anderson said. “If people can say whatever they want about a public figure, without accountability, it sets a dangerous precedent.”

The Fallout: ABC and Joy Behar Under Fire

The lawsuit has already caused significant fallout for both The View and ABC, its parent network. Inside sources claim that ABC executives are scrambling to manage the growing backlash. There are concerns that the legal battle could affect the network’s relationship with its audience, especially fans of Formula 1 who are now calling for a boycott of the show.

In the wake of the lawsuit, Behar has publicly defended her comments, stating that they were intended as lighthearted banter and not a personal attack on Verstappen. She expressed regret if anyone was offended but maintained that her remarks were in line with her usual style of commentary.”

I wasn’t trying to destroy anyone’s career or reputation. It’s all part of the conversation,” Behar told reporters in an interview. “Max is a fierce competitor, and I was just pointing that out. I have nothing against him personally.”

However, her comments have done little to quell the storm surrounding the lawsuit. Critics argue that Behar’s history of controversial remarks, combined with her position as a prominent public figure, makes her a prime target for legal action. Many believe that the case could reshape the boundaries of live television and the type of commentary that can be freely aired without legal repercussions.

As the lawsuit continues to dominate headlines, Verstappen has gained overwhelming support from fans and fellow racers. Several F1 drivers, including Lewis Hamilton, have publicly stood by him. Hamilton tweeted, “Max is one of the best on the track. He deserves respect, not baseless attacks.”

The controversy has also fueled intense debate on social media about the influence of talk shows like The View in shaping public opinion about athletes. Some argue that Behar’s remarks were harmless “banter,” while others insist they crossed a line and risk serious consequences.

With the legal battle moving forward, all eyes are on the courtroom. The case could establish a key precedent for how the media engages with athletes and the level of accountability public figures should bear for their words on live television.

As both sides remain firmly entrenched, it’s clear this lawsuit is far from over. The outcome could reshape media coverage of sports and redefine the relationship between athletes and the public figures who comment on them.